Home / Is the NDA legislation into UFOs exempt for Special Access Programs? What does it mean?

Is the NDA legislation into UFOs exempt for Special Access Programs? What does it mean?

by Adam Goldsack
0 comment
read time 2 mins

 6,019 total views,  4 views today

With the distrust of government voiced by Congressman Tim Burchett and the recent back and forth over the UAP report, the UAP research and activism community has hung its hat on ‘crash retrieval legislation’. In reality the legislation essentially equates to Congress writing laws to protect whistleblowers coming forward on Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena programs within government. This would mean that whistleblowers would be released from their Non Disclosure Agreements (NDA) with the United States Government and be free to talk to Congress at the unclassified level – about UFOs. Most recently, this was confirmed by Professor Garry Nolan in an interview with Ross Coulthart.

The problem, however, is that some Special Access Programs (SAP) are alleged to hold the more intriguing crash retrieval programs of UAP/UFOs. And this is gets into tricky situations around national security – should it be at all true. For the first time in an interview with Andy from ‘That UFO Podcast’, journalist Leslie Kean confirmed that the legislation wouldn’t include protection for whistleblowers within SAPs,  and therefore wouldn’t free them from their NDA secrecy oaths.

If what Leslie Kean has said is true, then that means SAP and government programs involving crash retrievals of UFOs are off the table. The legislation wouldn’t reveal such programs to Congress and certainly not to the public. That is provided there are no crash retrieval programs which are not contained within SAP – but how likely is it that such sensitive programs are unclassified or not ‘Top Secret’ etc?

Not very.

What does this mean for legislation?

This then leads us to Harry Reid created programs such as the Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program (AATIP) which was ran by Luis Elizondo, and the large Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) focused effort of the Advanced Aerospace Weapons System Application Program (AAWSAP). Parts of these programs are unclassified, let’s are not. Consider that Lue is still bound by his NDA on such government efforts to investigate UAP, and has expressed his own interest to speak if the opportunity arises.

Ultimately, whether SAP is included in the legislation or not, there needs to be protection for whistleblowers on multiple levels in ways which transcend legality. Personal threats and intimidation have apparently been made against potential whistleblowers and some are even claiming that some extreme groups will protect this secrecy at all costs. Which is scary to consider if true.

Update:

After speaking with Christopher Sharpe and others, it was made aware that ‘known’ SAPs to Congress would not be included within the legislation. However, this does not discount Unacknowledged Special Access Programs (USAP). These are rogue UFO programs that might be dealing with crash retrievals, and consequently, have no Congressional oversight. These USAPs are the focus.

 

◆◆◆

 

Related Articles

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.