3,003 total views, 6 views today
What can we assume without conclusively concluding?
Due to the absence of a publicly released official report we are left with confusion and severely contrasting official information.
1) We can possibly assume the drone(s) were more than one, although can not verify this or if they occurred over Gatwick at the same time.
2) We cannot verify that the drones were in fact drones (civilian or military) due to the absence of both official photos and videos, we also have not been allowed access to the 67 civilian reports.
3) Somehow theses objects evaded the police and army over a three day period. They somehow were not tracked back to the source of origin. Attempts to bring them down failed.
4) The flight times potentially were anything between 18-24 hours, exceeding the average civilian drone time of 25-30 minutes.
The potential for advanced military tech or even UAP must not be overlooked.
The bizarre probability of Unidentified Aerial Phenomenon (UAP) *25/12/2018
The strangest part throughout this whole case has been the lack of communication, in some cases very serious misinformation. Police aren’t talking amongst themselves with whatever other agencies have been involved (which they have). We are again left asking very serious questions, again, why have we no access to the drones descriptions given from the 67 reports?
Where is the official video footage? (only amateur footage is available), are we really been asked to believe over 3 days that no video evidence of the drones was captured. Ridiculous. In a post 9/11 world are we expected to think no drones were recorded, that not one of the hundreds of sightings via the 67 reports across 3 days shows anything?
Why is this accepted as normal by all mainstream media institutions?
Why in some of the amateur footage do we see images of objects which do not look like usual commercial drones?
The #GatwickDrones was became a popular hashtag
A video shown in the UK mirror tabloid shows a captured video of a disc looking object above the airport. However unless we receive descriptions of ‘silver discs’ from within the 67 reports this means little.
Will we get to see these reports? Is that a valid question to ask?
-credit Danny Silva for the link to pictures above.
What we should be hearing and seeing from the reports are of your typical ‘drone’ descriptions.
The above picture of a typical drone should have been available in abundance, and yet we haven’t seen or heard of anything so far.
The Mystery of the Gatwick Drones *24/12/2018
So now we are getting into some really uncomfortable territory. The couple who were arrested for the drone charge, a middle aged hard working man and women, it turns out had nothing at all to do with the crime. They were released without charge. A lot of people saw it coming.
The police issued a statement saying that they have found a damaged drone on the outskirts of the airport field almost straight after the admission that they blundered the names of inncocent people to the UK tabloids. Again, no real details were presented, only that forensics is being used to analyse the drone.
After that, (and this is where we get confused), we have the piece saying that there may be no drones at all. Amazing. It turns out the police are saying they do not have any video footage of the drones being at the airport at all. Which of course is bizarre. A reported 50+ sightings (up to this point) over the 3 days, 2 unofficial videos, and the airport captures no video footage? To now claim that there maybe no drones at all after they try to charge an innocent couple is beyond negligible.
So we are left asking how can this have happened?
Detective Chief Superintendent Jason Tingley spoke with the national U.K. media and indicated that maybe money will persuade someone to come forward with the vitally needed clue.
Sussex Police have insisted to the media that the investigation was “not back to square one” as a team of highly trained ‘investigators’ continue to evaluate the alledged 67 sightings and forensically examine the apparent drone found near the runway’s perimeter.
“We are actively investigating sightings of drone activity at Gatwick Airport following 67 reports from the evening of December 19 to December 21 from the public, passengers, police officers and staff at the airport,”
Dectective, Jason Tingley
We are still left to believe that 67 sightings have not been captured officially by the airports multiple cameras, or by the police or the army. Either they are lying to us for whatever reason and the videos are classified, or they never actually recorded any footage.
Both options are ridiculous.
*Update on the ‘No Drones’ scenario
The Guardian newspapernin the U.K. has noted this afternoon: The bizarre suggestion that there may never have been a drone at Gatwick Airport were down to “poor communications” rather than a genuine possibility that the incident was baseless, police have told the government.
Ministers were briefed on the latest situation at the airport in an hour-long conference call chaired by the transport secretary, Chris Grayling.
So basically, yes there were actual ‘drones’.
more to come…..
Unidentified Aerial Drones (UAD) of Gatwick (previous article) *23/12/2018
Sadly, a lot of conspiracy/cover up claims occur when a lack of relevant information is held back for security reasons. The Gatwick drones or Unidentified Aerial Drones (UAD) which occurred Wednesday 19th – Friday 21st of December caused mayhem for thousands of people traveling over the Christmas period. The culprits have yet to be charged for the criminal act.
The Gatwick incident is different to the usual idiot deploying a toy drone into an airport. Usually the aggressor is captured within hours and charged. But here we see a lack of information and detail. We have yet to see a clear picture of the drone(s) with only two videos online available, both show no detail.
We do not know how the drone was able to evade capture for so long or how they were able stay in the air for 24-36 hours. How did they know to reappear everytime the airport decided to open the runway? How did the drones ‘disappear’ when closed in on, why weren’t they tracked back to where they were recharged? Why did it take the police, army and MI5 so long to stop the attacks? Why do the drones have such a strange shape in the unofficial videos and photos?
There are many questions about the advanced ability of these UAD, many of which lead us to think this maybe wasn’t the work of middle class civilians with a drone hobby (maybe it was them, but they certainly don’t fit the profile, *it wasn’t the couple that were arrested).
The problem is transparency, or lack there of, the people (police, MI5, Army) on top of this haven’t released any details which help us make sense of this. Have these UADs been caught? I think for the British public it is important for assurances this won’t happen again. Currently, we do not have those.
https://youtu.be/c-wFLSBzH6I
