UAP Activism: Exposing Unidentified Flying Objects

read time 9 mins

 16,053 total views,  9 views today

We live in an ever changing world, a world dominated by the grossly misinformed and also by the constant state of flux by which it is defined. Fake news, speculation and a lack of transparency shape the landscape, not facts. Our political leaders are governed by what keeps them in power rather than what is right for the world. So when congresspersons are given classified briefings on unidentified aerial phenomena (UAP) we are not surprised to see a lack of movement. That is not to say there is a lack of interest, but active engagement comes through reduced stigma and apathy.

This is where you and me come into the frame, to re-frame a 70 year old topic fraught with pseudo-sceptics, religious zealots, conspiracy whack-jobs, new age cultists, UFO Gurus, people with severe mental health issues, hoax’s, active disinformation, misinformation and of course Susan Gough and co. As a UAP activist, you are on the backfoot from the starting line, facing a cohort of all of the above persons. Your mission, should you choose to accept it, is to bring one simple line of truth forward.

 

‘An unidentified aerial phenomena is engaging nuclear strike groups by which the United States government has officially classified the objects as ‘Unidentified’, such objects are defying our current understanding of both physics and propulsion. We do not know what they are and require official investigation.’

 

If you waver from this, if you try to interject your own beliefs of what the phenomena is, you will fail. If you say the words, ‘Aliens’ or ‘Extraterrestrials’ or ‘Interdimensionals’, you will fail. If you try to conclusively explain the phenomenon, you will fail.

Why? 

Because the people you are trying to reach already sense the extreme social stigma that surrounds this topic. They already know, without being told of the unspoken societal conditions and pressures, that believing in ‘UFOs and Aliens’ is crazy. So reframe the conversation.
As soon as you say the word Alien, you tap into their hostile subconscious, the unspoken fear of all those invasion films and tv programs. Their conscious mind will not allow them to process the concept of flesh eating, anal probing ‘Aliens’, and instead you will come up against a brick wall.

Ironically, it is a form of cognitive dissonance that Ufology has helped maintain all these years through their desperate approach to infer extraterrestrials as the origin to UFOs.
Pseudo-Sceptics need UFOs to be linked to Aliens so they can easily dismiss any case on the basis of psychological stigma rather than facts. They will ignore data and sometimes even try to manipulate videos in any way they can in the absence of official clarification.

 

‘Pseudo-Sceptics thrive in the void left by hidden data, they try to explain away what they see instead of requesting more transparency and data.’

 

Always with a sense of subjective humility, I do enjoy the over dramatic inference of ‘ET disclosure’, despite its repugnant effectiveness as a progressive concept.

It is a term of ideology more complex than simply sending off an FOIA request and then concluding on the premature result despite severe contrasting data (that’s just how you might eventually end up looking a bit silly). We don’t know UFOs are specifically ET, they might very well be, but as activists we need to engage the general public at their own level. We do know that ‘ET Disclosure’ will never happen in a climate where UFOs are not universally accepted for their ‘Unidentified’ status.

UAP exposure is a process of ideology, an almost impossible change in global thinking and one that I still probably don’t fully understand or appreciate. To succeed we don’t only need to change the psychological belief systems of some 7 billion people, but also, we need to change the thinking of Ufology itself. The first step, is to develop our very own creation, #UFOtwitter.

 

A History of Activism 

In my twenties I remember really disliking activists, mainly because at that time I was very distant from the world. I never really cared about politics or religion. It was an easy way to live. Also, I disliked activism because it was arrogant individuals enforcing their own strong beliefs, opinions and perspectives onto others, forcing those others to accept another way of thinking, behaving and considering a completely different way to how the world works.
Only with experience did I learn the world needs activism, it’s how we challenge the status quo and the conservative norm, it’s how we as a human race progress to something better.

 

 

Maybe we don’t really need to understand the full implications of UAP activism, just that it is more important than anything that has gone before, and I don’t say that lightly.

 

 

With regard to the early concepts of how ‘UFO disclosure’ itself would hypothetically play out, many a good ‘UFO’ book (I recommend, Zabel + Dolan – After Disclosure) has  been written about the vast, significant implications of a ‘post disclosure world’, albeit based in the form of ‘event disclosure’.

There are numerous questions to consider from this approach. How will the world accept and reconcile that the phenomena is potentially non-human in origin rather than simply explained by conventional weather balloons or birds? What are the legal ramifications for those who kept such a secret? What does this mean for religion?

I guess the real question is, can we really be prepared for something so alarming and potentially devastating to enter our collective consciousness? After all, this phenomenon has the potential to devastate our entire global-financial-religious-economic-lawful society, much the same way a nuclear bomb would devastate a city.

So I would argue, yes, it can be done, but not in the way most people would imagine.

The trick is not for us to force the hostile explosive into our current global society to explode (event Disclosure), but rather, we change ourselves (process Disclosure), we change society as it is now to accommodate the hostile explosive in a way that it is more like a firework to be marvelled at, rather than a nuclear bomb when it explodes.

 

 

A New Approach 

My work in clinical rehab requires intense neurological rehabilitation of cerebral vascular accidents. From a certain perspective it is similar to how we might currently view the governmental approach to the UAP phenomena, it is broken, ineffective and desperately trying to find a way in how to move forward into a delicately balanced future. For one, rehabilitation doesn’t happen overnight, it is a process.

One wrong move and the world will haemorrhage. Society will bleed out.

Accepting that people working in government on the UAP issue are indeed good people is indeed difficult. They hold 70 years of responsibility on their shoulders making it an almost impossible task of ensuring national security is protected whilst navigating the fine balance of telling the public. This was all made easier to accept by the decisions to push forward the ‘AATIP revelations’, bringing about a new golden age of official UAP transparency and positive media attention. The world needs it. So as we sit on the edge of more intense and imminent disclosures coming again and again from the same people who pushed the AATIP and recent Navy revelations, I can’t help but be mindful of this past year and how we might change ourselves to adapt to the change.

I am looking most notably to the ‘Unidentified: Season 2’ documentary which is about to surface this summer (at time of writing).

These are initiatives which will further the process of having the phenomena revealed to the mainstream public in a way which supports national security instead of destabilising it. As Luis Elizondo stated in a reply to our article on congressional briefings in early 2019.

 

“…this MUST be done properly and in a manner that is constructive and not destructive to our National Security.”

 

– Luis Elizondo, replying to ‘The Unidentified’ 2019

 

The rise of #UFOTwitter signalled the start of a separation from mainstream Ufology. A robust, more psychologically aware subculture splintered off, learning from the mistakes of the 70 years. No cultist ideology, no Guru leader and no unverifiable conspiracy.

Most famously, #UFOTwitter instigated a dramatic reframing in attitude towards defining ‘UFOs’. Even the terminology from UFO to UAP signalled a much needed foundation change. However, these changes are still reliant upon official government sourced help. They lead, we follow. We are only as good as the last ‘wave’ of credible data, and the retraction of AATIP as UAP is a massive deal breaker for us and the government and the trust we have built.

 

“The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again, but expecting different results.”

 

– Albert Einstein

 

The Outreach Program (OP) was derived from the need for change within how Ufology addresses itself and the public. The OP has so far engaged and exposed Journalists, Scientists, Politicians, Celebrities and the general public to credible UAP cases (Roosevelt and Nimitz) through social media platforms.

 

 

‘UAP activism’ itself is a strange thing and can be differentiated from ‘UFO activism’, which again is different from any other accepted form of activism. UAP activists are more precise, specific in content focus, and drawing focus to data which is very difficult for the target to dispute  (without looking like a conspiracy theorist themselves).

This occurred through various social media platforms at grassroots level. Most famously, the emergence of a symbol. A ‘Red Cross Circle’ ?.

The Red Cross Circle ? was initially first used by Danny Silva in his article that questioned pentagon spokeswoman Susan Gough, and whether there had been any illegal activity with unclassified FOIA data. In what started out as a joke, Danny started creating Red Cross circles on people’s avatars from #UFOtwitter. Myself was one of the first who used the cross as their own Twitter avatar.

 

 

The ? was initially to protest Susan Gough’s alledged illegal withholding and coordination of unclassified UAP data via FOIAs. The concept grew and more and more people adapted the symbol. We ourselves, have now developed the concept to go further. The Red Cross Circle now represents a protest against hidden, UAP data and information at the unclassified level.

 

Sadly, most people in Ufology struggle to make this distinction, to them, the government is one big monolith that is the same throughout. We have found this dogmatic thinking very problematic this past year.

The very ideology of ‘UFO disclosure’ suggests to some a reality which is only possible via the unattainable dreams of the most evangelical utopian. Unattractive and unattainable. A more realistic version is required. Disclosure 2.0.

UAP exposure might lead to answers for a fundamental question of whether we are alone in this universe. We would find out if we are the only ‘intelligent consciousness’ in the cosmos, as well as opening doors to a new future. A better future in which advanced technology allows us to access clean energy, to spiritual evolution and for us as humans to travel amongst the stars one day. All seems very ideal at face value. We have barriers, however.

The world has a right to know the truth about unclassified information, you know this and so do they, those who are part of the ‘Sekret’ itself are finally ready to responsibly release the information they hold under lock and key. And it is happening. But not by everyone, some in DOD are still pretending the phenomenon doesn’t exist.

 

Never before has mankind needed such a dramatic revolution. Humanity stands on a knife edge, the threats of climate change, nuclear war and severe over population should we turn away from this issues surrounding the UFO phenomena.

The advanced UAP based technologies can change everything in this world should we be brave enough to fully accept the new reality. That is worth the fight and the effort. As a UAP activist trying to engage society to take the  phenomena seriously we have been given a gift. Friends and family stutter with confused ignorance as credible media articles are rolled out. The battle is won but the war for UAPinfo is just beginning.

Be the change you want to see in the world. You want UFOs to be taken seriously then become serious, become something the world can accept (And if the phenomenon really is extraterrestrials…then that will come out down the line in time).

However, be warned that should we fail then it would mean the world will continue as it always has done, it means the world will have once again ignored the most important issue in the history of mankind. Ignorance will arguably be our downfall and bring about our ensuing chronic doom. But I am willing to bet that we will not get a better chance than this again.

At least not in our lifetime.

 

---

Write your congressman or women. Protest illegal UAP secrecy of unclassified information.